⚜ PRINCIPIA ORTHOGONA · Vol XIII · Coherence ← Ch 6  ·  Ch 8 →
Vol XIII · Coherence · Chapter 7 · Partial result · 2026-08-29

What the Kernel Can Check

The admissibility test this volume has to pass before it is written
StatusStub · specification only
Rung30 · Higher Category Theory
MathlibCategoryTheory 1089 files
measured 2026-09-12
ArtifactAXLE/Vol13_Coherence.lean
first run 2026-08-29

The series rule is that an entry is written only when there is a recorded artifact behind it. This chapter is where Volume XIII either acquires one or admits it has not.

The instrument

One Lean file, pinned to the Mathlib actually built in the geometry repository, elaborating with zero errors, ending in #print axioms over every declaration the volume claims. The permitted set is propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound. Anything reporting sorryAx is an admit and is named as one in the chapter that depends on it.

Three failure modes this corpus has already recorded

Fixtures

Each detector used in this volume ships with cases it is required to reject. A gate that has never rejected anything is not known to work. This is not optional infrastructure; it is the reason two of the three failure modes above were ever found.

Result · 2026-08-29

A fourth failure mode, observed on the first run

The chapter-3 file was written with a fixture: a declaration vacuity_control : True := trivial, deliberately contentless, placed in the audit so that the probe would have something it ought to be able to reject. It could not.

'Vol13.chain₀_assoc' does not depend on any axioms 'Vol13.chain₀_bracketing_free' does not depend on any axioms 'Vol13.chain₁_assoc' depends on axioms: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] 'Vol13.chain₁_assoc_rfl' depends on axioms: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] 'Vol13.iterate₁_succ' depends on axioms: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] 'Vol13.iterate₁_regroup' depends on axioms: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] 'Vol13.assoc₂_hom_inv' does not depend on any axioms 'Vol13.assoc₂_inv_hom' does not depend on any axioms 'Vol13.vacuity_control' does not depend on any axioms

Read the last three lines together. assoc₂_hom_inv and assoc₂_inv_hom carry the entire mathematical content of level 2 — the associator is invertible, so the bracketings are isomorphic and not equal. vacuity_control says nothing at all. The reports are byte-identical. DATA

And the count runs backwards
DeclarationContentAxioms
chain₁_assoctrivial — a rewrite by two lemmas3
assoc₂_hom_invsubstantive — invertibility of the associator0
vacuity_controlnone0

Axiom count is not a proxy for content. In this file it is anti-correlated: the trivial statements carry three axioms and the substantive ones carry none. The three on the chain₁ family almost certainly enter through the ambient Category and Functor machinery the statements reference, not through anything their proofs do — checkable with #print axioms CategoryTheory.Functor.assoc, and not yet checked here. OPEN

The rule this establishes

#print axioms reports what a declaration rests on. It never reports what a declaration says. A clean axiom report is a floor, not a certificate, and no volume in this series may cite one as evidence that a theorem has content. Reading the statement remains mandatory. This is the empirical version of the argument in book8/ch-do-not-trust-verify.html.

Still open

One file exists and its report is printed above verbatim, with its fixture. The chapter closes when every other chapter of this volume has one — chapter 2 above all, which chapter 3 has now made load-bearing for the entire volume.