For a planar system with eigenvalues μ ± iω, the quantity Strogatz classifies by is τ² − 4Δ, and it comes out as follows.
Negative with no further hypothesis. So the system spirals as soon as ω ≠ 0, and it is a sink exactly when μ < 0. “Spiral sink” is the whole of the shared description, and eleven systems meeting it have almost nothing in common — eleven damped oscillators picked at random would meet it too.
Conjugating by an invertible matrix leaves the trace and the determinant alone. Since τ = 2μ and Δ = μ² + ω², the pair (μ, ω²) is an invariant of the system and not of the chart.
Strogatz, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos (2018), sha256 e4c3681c…, 532 pp, in docs/floor-texts.tsv. §5.2 “Classification of Linear Systems”, printed pp. 129–138; the discriminant on pp. 132, 135 and 138; the classification diagram at Figure 5.2.8, p. 138. Located by script against that file, and the script refuses outright if the sha does not match — because every page number here then describes a copy the reader does not have.
| ch | title | state |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | What “the Same System” Means — the discriminant, the invariants, and the pair that fails | live |
| 2 | Topological conjugacy — the sense in which they are all alike, and why it carries no information | written 2026-09-27 — ch02-verify.py, 0 FAIL |
| 3 | Hartman–Grobman — what the linearisation is entitled to say about the nonlinear system | written 2026-09-27 — ch03-verify.py, 0 FAIL |
What this volume stands on, planned 2026-11-02. The solutions of a linear system are the matrix exponential, which is a power series, so the convergence in Book XVIII chapter 7 comes first. Linearising a nonlinear system means taking its Jacobian at a fixed point, which is Book XVIII chapters 2 and 8 and Book XXIV chapter 5. The eigenvalue classification used here is Book XXIV chapter 7, and the continuity and uniform-convergence steps inside Hartman–Grobman rest on Book XVIII chapter 9. Those chapters are planned, not written, so nothing in this volume has been rechecked against them yet.
sorryAx. A clean axiom report is not a reading of the statement: per R20, a theorem can assume its conclusion and still report clean. Follow the link before citing one as evidence.