G7 · The Scientist Gallery · Attribution Series
MATHEMATICS · PURE

Edward Frenkel

He and Boris Feigin showed that at one special level the centre of an affine algebra is the W-algebra of the Langlands dual. It is the only one of this slate's four chapters whose subject the corpus already half-stands on.

b. 2 May 1968, Kolomna · PhD Harvard 1991, under Boris Feigin and Joseph Bernstein · Harvard 1991–97 · Berkeley since 1997 · Hermann Weyl Prize 2002 · Love and Math, 2013, Euler Book Prize 2015

Part I · What he and Feigin showed

A centre that is a dual algebra

An affine Kac–Moody algebra &ghat; has a distinguished level, the critical level k = −h∨, where the Sugawara construction of a Virasoro action breaks down because its normalisation 1/(2(k + h∨)) is undefined. What replaces the Virasoro algebra there is something larger: the centre of the vertex algebra, which Feigin and Frenkel identified with a classical W-algebra — and the W-algebra is that of the Langlands dual algebra Lg, not of g itself. This is the Feigin–Frenkel centre. ch-feigin carries the statement and computes the data it is stated in terms of; this chapter is about the man who carried it into the Langlands program.

The route is local. Opers on a punctured disc — connections of a special form — are the spectrum of that centre, and they are local systems for the dual group, which is the Langlands parameter. Frenkel's 2007 Cambridge book, Langlands Correspondence for Loop Groups, and his later survey work set the centre inside the program, and the opers are the same ones Beilinson and Drinfeld used globally; that chapter is the whole-curve end of this disc-level construction.

He is also the author of Love and Math (2013), a bestseller on exactly this subject for readers with no mathematics, which won the 2015 Euler Book Prize. A gallery that attributes should say so: much of the public sense of what the Langlands program is comes from that book.

Part II · The part you can check

A necessary condition, in sixteen types

ch-feigin says plainly that the isomorphism is not checked there, not even for sl2. It is not checked here either. What is checked is something the isomorphism forces: two vertex algebras that are isomorphic have the same central charge. The W-algebra of g at level k has, with t = k + h∨,

c_g(t)  =  l  -  12 |rho - t rho^v|^2 / t          (l = rank)

and the duality is r(k+h∨)(k′ + Lh∨) = 1, where r is the lacing number (1 for simply-laced types, 2 for B, C, F4, 3 for G2). So the necessary condition is cg(t) = cLg(1/(rt)). ch-frenkel-verify.py computes both sides from Cartan matrices alone, in exact rational arithmetic, and compares them at twelve values of t in each of sixteen types. They agree in every one.

The formula's inner product is first tested against the Freudenthal–de Vries strange formula, |ρ|² = h∨ dim g / 12, in all sixteen types. The formula as a whole is anchored to values it did not produce: at t = 4/3 or 3/4 the Virasoro case gives c = 1/2 (the Ising model); at 5/4, 7/10 (the tricritical Ising model); and the W3 case at 5/4 gives 4/5 (the three-state Potts model). At t = 1 the simply-laced types all give c = rank; the non-simply-laced ones do not, and the script checks that they don't, because there ρ ≠ ρ∨ and the fixed point of t → 1/(rt) is elsewhere.

The controls are the part that earns the rest. If the lacing number is forgotten and the dual level is taken to be 1/t, the duality fails in all seven non-simply-laced types tested: so the check can see the factor r. B3, B4, C3 and C4 have different central charges at the same t, so the check can tell an algebra from its dual; and B2 (which equals C2), F4 and G2, which are self-dual, have equal ones, which they must.

What this does not show. Equal central charge is necessary for isomorphism and nowhere near sufficient. No W-algebra is constructed, no centre is exhibited, no isomorphism is verified. The check says that if Feigin–Frenkel is true, this number cannot contradict it; it does not say the theorem is true. Nor does it bear on the part that makes the theorem a Langlands statement, the identification of the spectrum with opers and with dual local systems.

Two earlier checks on this slate each had a version that could not have failed. Two of this script's first-run failures were its author's: a claim that c = rank at t = 1 in every type, which is false outside the simply-laced ones; and a control comparing g with its dual in types where they coincide.

Part III · What this corpus has, and does not

Rung thirty-two, fourth occupant

This is the chapter the slate was designed to end on, because it is the one that reaches back. ch-feigin already stands on the vertex-algebra route that WP-82's correction of 2026-09-11 retained. What this chapter adds is the man, the dual-level arithmetic, and the connection from the disc to the curve. It adds no construction. WP-130 counted the programme's mathematicians at zero before the slate began. With Langlands, Drinfeld & Beilinson and the provers, they now have four chapters. The floor is a gallery floor: names, dates, one checkable object each, and no claim to build.

Sources

Wikipedia, Edward Frenkel (birth date and place, doctorate and advisors, Harvard and Berkeley appointments, Hermann Weyl Prize 2002, Love and Math 2013 and Euler Book Prize 2015, the 2007 Cambridge book). · Frenkel, Langlands Correspondence for Loop Groups, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 103, 2007. · Feigin & Frenkel, on the centre at the critical level, from 1991 (as cited in ch-feigin). · Fateev & Lukyanov for the central-charge form; Freudenthal & de Vries for the strange formula. · Checks: book7/ch-frenkel-verify.py.

This chapter makes no claim about Frenkel's present circumstances.